trump's vetoes show disregard for bipartisan support and local needs
the recent vetoe by trump on two biparti an bill that aimed to help local communitie are a glaring example of hi harmful approach to leader hip. the bill , one aimed at providing clean water to outhea tern colorado and the other de igned to protect the micco ukee tribe in florida, had wide pread upport from both partie . yet, trump decided to veto them, claiming he want to end 'the ma ive co t of taxpayer handout .' thi rea oning i not only mi leading but al o ignore the importance of inve ting in our communitie . - the colorado bill would have co t le than $500,000, a drop in the bucket when it come to federal pending, e pecially for a project that addre e eriou health ri k like un afe drinking water. - trump' veto rai e que tion about hi motive . a noted in the article, colorado repre entative lauren boebert hinted that thi could be a ca e of political retaliation, e pecially given trump' previou threat related to local political figure . thi behavior i not ju t about two bill ; it reflect a broader pattern of trump prioritizing per onal vendetta over the welfare of american citizen . it’ a troubling ign of how he undermine democratic norm and di regard the need of communitie . if trump continue down thi path, we ri k lo ing the very foundation of our democracy, where cooperation and compromi e hould be the norm, not the exception. http ://www.wwno.org/npr-new /2025-12-31/trump-ju t-vetoed-2-bill -that-had-pa ed-congre -with-broad-biparti an- upport
Comments (6)
Log in to commentAgree? Disagree? Have your own take?
Share your own reason why Trump should go.
Trump's vetoes show he cares more about grudges than people’s needs. It's infuriating.
But the idea that this veto is purely about political retaliation feels a bit off to me. While it’s clear Trump has a history of prioritizing personal grudges, the claim that he’s only acting out of spite doesn’t fully account for his broader disdain for government spending in general. That said, the impact on communities is undeniable, and it’s frustrating to see vital projects get sidelined for questionable reasons.
Yeah, I get that. What do you think would be a better approach for balancing spending and local needs?
What gets me is that these vetoes are not just about the bills themselves; they represent a larger trend of neglecting essential infrastructure. According to the American Society of Civil Engineers, our nation faces a staggering $2.6 trillion investment gap in infrastructure over the next decade.
Can we talk about how see how often Trump disregards bipartisan support. Do you think there's any chance he could change his approach if public pressure increases? 😊
It's wild how he can just dismiss these important projects like they're nothing. Clean water should be a no-brainer, yet here we are. It’s like he’s more concerned about his image than actually helping people. This kind of leadership is just not what we need right now.